A quesition to “The Law of Attraction” by Esther & Jerry Hicks: Esther tells in all publications, that there i
Written by admin on December 3rd, 2008
s no culprit and no victim, but there are only co-creators. Means, that all belongs together, cause,f.e., the “victim” of a robbery invited the ganster who robbed by the own fear and the own thoughts about crime.
So far I understood.
But how about violence against little children/babies?
Or sexual child abuse of little kids?
They don´t no anything about it-how could they have had attract such misery into their lifes?
Sorry for my spoiled english…
I read all books of the Hick´s, watched all films, heard all their audios, but I can´t find the answer to this question.
And, unfortunately, it is impossible to write an email to them, there´s no possible access.
Do you have any ideas?
Thanks so much for answering.
Tags: Hick, Law Of Attraction, Little Kids, Read Books, Sexual Abuse, Write Email
2 Comments at "A quesition to “The Law of Attraction” by Esther & Jerry Hicks: Esther tells in all publications, that there i"
I agree with the concept that we create our own lives by the choices we make. There is also a random quality to this concept because I doubt it’s infallable in every circumstance, especially where children are concerned. There must be a point in life when we are aware enough to realize that we are creating our life but people often hide from this truth claiming victimization. I wish I had more insight into why ‘innocents’ have attracted misery - it doesn’t seem fair.
Of course you are right in the cases where the victim has no say as to whether or not they are victimized but there are many cases, especially in domestic abuse where the victim and victimizer form a weird sort of partnership.
Again, people who go into areas they know are trouble cannot be surprised if they have problems.
Comment Now!